The Bengals vs Baltimore Ravens match player stats from the November 27, 2025 AFC North matchup highlight Cincinnati’s impressive 32–14 victory at M&T Bank Stadium. Joe Burrow returned from injury and threw for 261 yards and two touchdowns, while Ja’Marr Chase produced 110 receiving yards. Lamar Jackson passed for 246 yards but Baltimore committed five turnovers, which proved decisive.
Bengals vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats Overview
The Cincinnati Bengals and Baltimore Ravens have developed one of the most competitive rivalries in the AFC North. Their 2025 meeting on November 27 was particularly important because both teams entered the game with different objectives and plenty at stake.
Cincinnati traveled to Baltimore looking to change the direction of its season, while the Ravens were attempting to continue their strong run. Instead, the Bengals produced a convincing 32–14 road victory, ending Baltimore’s five-game winning streak.
The biggest storyline was the return of Cincinnati quarterback Joe Burrow, who had missed nine games because of injury. Burrow immediately gave the Bengals offense greater stability, while Cincinnati’s defense created several game-changing plays.
The final box score tells only part of the story. The Bengals finished with 382 total yards, held the ball for almost 39 minutes and forced five turnovers. Baltimore managed 346 total yards but struggled to turn its possessions into points.
Final Score
| Team | 1st Quarter | 2nd Quarter | 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter | Final |
| Cincinnati Bengals | 3 | 9 | 14 | 6 | 32 |
| Baltimore Ravens | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 14 |
The score demonstrates how quickly the momentum shifted. Baltimore scored first, but Cincinnati gradually took control and dominated the second half.
Joe Burrow Stats vs Baltimore Ravens
Joe Burrow’s return was the headline of the game.
After missing nine games, Burrow stepped back onto the field and completed 24 of 46 passes for 261 yards and two touchdowns. Most importantly, he did not throw an interception.
| Passing Statistic | Joe Burrow |
| Completions | 24 |
| Attempts | 46 |
| Completion Percentage | 52.2% |
| Passing Yards | 261 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 |
Burrow’s completion percentage was not spectacular, but his performance was significant considering the circumstances surrounding his return.
He showed enough arm strength and pocket confidence to keep Cincinnati’s offense functioning against a Baltimore defense that was attempting to disrupt him.
His two touchdown passes went to Tanner Hudson and Andrei Iosivas, giving the Bengals the finishing ability they needed in the red zone.
Another important part of Burrow’s performance was ball security. Baltimore’s offense repeatedly lost possession, while Burrow avoided the type of mistake that could have allowed the Ravens to regain momentum.
Why Burrow’s Return Mattered
The Bengals had struggled offensively during Burrow’s absence. His return gave Cincinnati the ability to attack Baltimore through the air while also creating opportunities for its running game.
Even when Burrow was not completing every pass, Baltimore had to respect his ability to make throws downfield. That helped open space for Cincinnati’s running backs and receivers.
His return also appeared to provide confidence to the entire Bengals offense.
Lamar Jackson Stats vs Bengals
Lamar Jackson entered the game as one of Baltimore’s most important offensive players, but his performance was overshadowed by turnovers.
Jackson completed 17 of 32 passes for 246 yards, but he failed to throw a touchdown and recorded one interception.
| Passing Statistic | Lamar Jackson |
| Completions | 17 |
| Attempts | 32 |
| Completion Percentage | 53.1% |
| Passing Yards | 246 |
| Passing TDs | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
Jackson’s 246 passing yards show that Baltimore was capable of moving the ball through the air. The problem was finishing drives and protecting possession.
The quarterback also lost two fumbles, contributing heavily to Baltimore’s five total turnovers.
That turnover problem became one of the clearest differences between the two teams.
Bengals Rushing Stats
Cincinnati’s running game complemented Burrow effectively.
Chase Brown led the Bengals in rushing with 78 yards on 15 carries, averaging 5.2 yards per attempt.
| Bengals Rusher | Carries | Yards |
| Chase Brown | 15 | 78 |
| Samaje Perine | 14 | 39 |
| Joe Burrow | 3 | 8 |
Brown’s production was important because Cincinnati did not need Burrow to throw on every possession.
The Bengals were able to maintain balance by running the football, controlling the clock and forcing Baltimore’s defense to defend multiple dimensions.
Samaje Perine also contributed with 39 yards on 14 attempts.
Together, Cincinnati’s rushing attack helped keep the Ravens defense from simply focusing on Burrow and his receivers.
Baltimore Ravens Rushing Stats
Derrick Henry remained one of Baltimore’s primary offensive weapons.
Henry finished with 60 rushing yards on 10 carries and scored a touchdown.
| Ravens Rusher | Carries | Yards | TD |
| Derrick Henry | 10 | 60 | 1 |
| Baltimore Other Rushers | — | — | 1 |
Henry immediately showed his ability to create explosive plays, scoring Baltimore’s first touchdown on a 28-yard run.
However, Baltimore could not maintain that efficiency throughout the game.
Cincinnati’s defense adjusted as the game progressed, and Baltimore eventually struggled to consistently generate scoring drives.
Ja’Marr Chase Stats vs Ravens
Ja’Marr Chase was Cincinnati’s leading receiving threat.
He finished the game with 7 receptions for 110 yards, making him the only Bengals receiver to surpass 100 yards.
| Receiving Statistic | Ja’Marr Chase |
| Receptions | 7 |
| Targets | — |
| Receiving Yards | 110 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
Chase’s 110 yards were especially important because Baltimore had to devote significant defensive attention to him.
His presence creates opportunities for other Cincinnati receivers because defenses cannot easily concentrate on one side of the field.
Although Chase did not score a touchdown, his production helped Cincinnati sustain drives and generate favorable situations for Burrow.
Isaiah Likely Stats
Baltimore’s leading receiver was Isaiah Likely, who finished with 5 receptions for 95 yards.
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards |
| Isaiah Likely | 5 | 95 |
Likely’s performance demonstrated that Baltimore’s passing game could still create significant yardage.
His 95 yards represented one of the best individual offensive performances for the Ravens.
However, individual production was not enough because Baltimore struggled with turnovers and failed to maintain possession.
Bengals Receiving Touchdowns
Two of Cincinnati’s touchdown passes came through Tanner Hudson and Andrei Iosivas.
| Player | Team | Receiving TD |
| Tanner Hudson | Bengals | 1 |
| Andrei Iosivas | Bengals | 1 |
These touchdowns were important because Cincinnati converted its offensive opportunities into points while Baltimore repeatedly gave away possessions.
Bengals Defensive Player Stats
Cincinnati’s defense played a major role in the victory.
The Bengals forced five turnovers, which completely changed the game’s balance.
Jordan Battle led Cincinnati with 10 tackles, while Joseph Ossai recorded two sacks.
Demetrius Knight Jr. also recorded an interception.
| Bengals Defender | Key Statistic |
| Jordan Battle | 10 tackles |
| Joseph Ossai | 2 sacks |
| Demetrius Knight Jr. | 1 interception |
The defensive performance was particularly impressive because Baltimore had enough offensive talent to create points when given opportunities.
Cincinnati’s defense repeatedly stopped those opportunities by forcing turnovers.
Baltimore Ravens Defensive Stats
Baltimore’s defense also had several strong individual performances despite allowing 32 points.
Roquan Smith led the Ravens with 11 tackles, while Marlon Humphrey recorded a sack.
| Ravens Defender | Key Statistic |
| Roquan Smith | 11 tackles |
| Marlon Humphrey | 1 sack |
Smith’s tackle total shows how active he was throughout the game.
However, Baltimore’s defense was placed in difficult situations because the Ravens offense could not consistently protect the football.
Bengals vs Ravens Team Statistics
The team statistics provide a clearer explanation for Cincinnati’s victory.
| Team Statistic | Bengals | Ravens |
| Total Yards | 382 | 346 |
| First Downs | 22 | 16 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 5 |
| Time of Possession | 38:46 | 21:14 |
| Third Down | 8/19 | 3/10 |
| Fourth Down | 1/2 | 1/2 |
| Final Score | 32 | 14 |
The most striking number is the turnover difference.
Cincinnati finished with one turnover, while Baltimore committed five.
That produced a +4 turnover differential for the Bengals.
In a divisional game between two teams with talented quarterbacks, that type of advantage can be decisive.
Turnover Battle Decided the Game
If one statistic explains the Bengals’ victory better than any other, it is turnovers.
Baltimore gave the ball away five times.
Those mistakes created additional opportunities for Cincinnati’s offense and prevented the Ravens from sustaining momentum.
Lamar Jackson’s interception was particularly damaging, but his two lost fumbles also contributed to Baltimore’s problems.
Meanwhile, Joe Burrow avoided an interception.
This created a major difference in possession efficiency.
The Bengals did not necessarily need to dominate every statistical category because they repeatedly received extra possessions.
Time of Possession Advantage
Another major factor was time of possession.
Cincinnati controlled the football for 38:46, compared with only 21:14 for Baltimore.
That is a difference of more than 17 minutes.
The longer Cincinnati possessed the ball, the less time Baltimore had to operate its offense.
This was particularly important against a Ravens team built around Lamar Jackson, Derrick Henry and its explosive skill-position players.
Keeping Baltimore’s offense on the sideline limited its opportunities to recover from mistakes.
Third-Down Performance
Cincinnati also performed better on third downs.
The Bengals converted 8 of 19 third-down attempts, while Baltimore converted only 3 of 10.
| Team | Third Down Conversions |
| Bengals | 8/19 |
| Ravens | 3/10 |
Although Cincinnati’s third-down percentage was not elite, the Bengals had more success extending drives.
That helped explain the large difference in possession time.
When Cincinnati converted a third down, it often kept the Ravens defense on the field and continued moving toward scoring range.
How the Game Developed
First Quarter
Baltimore initially looked like the stronger team.
The Bengals opened the scoring with an Evan McPherson field goal, but Derrick Henry responded with a 28-yard rushing touchdown.
Baltimore therefore finished the first quarter with a 7–3 lead.
At that point, the game appeared to be following the expected script, with the Ravens using their running game and Cincinnati attempting to establish Burrow’s rhythm.
Second Quarter
The Bengals began changing the momentum in the second quarter.
Cincinnati scored nine points while Baltimore was held scoreless.
The Bengals entered halftime with a lead and much more confidence.
Burrow was finding his receivers, and Cincinnati’s defense was beginning to create pressure on Jackson.
Third Quarter
The third quarter became the turning point.
Cincinnati scored 14 points and Baltimore managed only seven.
The Bengals’ offense became increasingly effective, while Baltimore struggled to protect the football.
By the end of the third quarter, Cincinnati had created a significant advantage.
Fourth Quarter
Baltimore was unable to produce a comeback.
The Bengals added six more points and kept the Ravens out of the end zone.
The final score of 32–14 gave Cincinnati one of its most impressive wins of the season.
Bengals Offensive Leaders
Here is a simplified view of Cincinnati’s major offensive contributors:
| Category | Player | Performance |
| Passing | Joe Burrow | 261 yards, 2 TD |
| Rushing | Chase Brown | 78 yards |
| Receiving | Ja’Marr Chase | 110 yards |
| Receiving TD | Tanner Hudson | 1 |
| Receiving TD | Andrei Iosivas | 1 |
This distribution shows that Cincinnati did not rely on a single player.
Burrow handled the passing game, Chase created explosive receiving plays and Brown provided balance on the ground.
Ravens Offensive Leaders
Baltimore also had several productive players.
| Category | Player | Performance |
| Passing | Lamar Jackson | 246 yards |
| Rushing | Derrick Henry | 60 yards, 1 TD |
| Receiving | Isaiah Likely | 95 yards |
| Rushing TD | Derrick Henry | 1 |
The problem for Baltimore was not a complete lack of production.
Instead, turnovers, limited possessions and poor third-down efficiency prevented the Ravens from turning their production into enough points.
Bengals vs Ravens Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways
Several conclusions stand out from the box score.
Joe Burrow successfully returned
Burrow’s return was one of the biggest stories of the matchup. He threw for 261 yards and two touchdowns without an interception.
Ja’Marr Chase surpassed 100 yards
Chase finished with 110 receiving yards and remained Cincinnati’s biggest receiving threat.
Derrick Henry remained explosive
Henry averaged six yards per carry and scored Baltimore’s first touchdown.
Lamar Jackson struggled with turnovers
Jackson passed for 246 yards but threw an interception and lost two fumbles.
Cincinnati dominated possession
The Bengals held the football for nearly 39 minutes.
Baltimore committed five turnovers
This was ultimately the biggest statistical problem for the Ravens.
How Match Player Stats Help Sports Fans Compare Games
Match player statistics are useful not only for NFL analysis but also for understanding performances across different professional sports. Baseball fans, for example, may research detroit tigers vs seattle mariners match player stats to compare batting production, pitching performances, runs, hits and defensive contributions between the two MLB teams.
Basketball followers use a similar statistical approach when examining scoring, rebounds, assists, shooting percentages and defensive plays. For example, houston rockets vs lakers match player stats can help fans evaluate which players made the biggest offensive and defensive contributions during a basketball matchup.
The key difference is that every sport uses its own statistical categories. In the NFL, passing yards, rushing yards, receptions, tackles, sacks and turnovers are especially important. Looking at these numbers alongside the final score provides a much clearer picture of why a team won or lost.
For the Bengals and Ravens, the most important statistics from the November 27, 2025 matchup were Cincinnati’s five takeaways, Joe Burrow’s 261 passing yards, Ja’Marr Chase’s 110 receiving yards and the Bengals’ significant time-of-possession advantage. These numbers explain the 32–14 result more effectively than the final score alone.
Why the Bengals Won
The Bengals’ victory can be explained through four major factors.
1. Ball Security
Cincinnati gave Baltimore only one turnover opportunity while forcing five turnovers.
2. Joe Burrow’s Return
Burrow immediately improved the Bengals’ offensive stability.
3. Time of Possession
Cincinnati controlled the ball for more than 38 minutes.
4. Defensive Pressure
The Bengals generated pressure on Jackson and consistently forced Baltimore into difficult situations.
Together, these factors created a game that became increasingly difficult for the Ravens to recover from.
What Went Wrong for Baltimore?
The Ravens had enough yardage to make the game competitive, but several problems prevented them from staying in control.
The biggest issue was turnovers.
Five turnovers are extremely difficult to overcome against a divisional opponent.
Baltimore also struggled on third down, converting only three of 10 attempts.
The Ravens’ 21:14 time of possession meant their offense simply did not receive enough sustained opportunities.
Jackson’s individual yardage numbers were respectable, but turnovers reduced the value of that production.
Bengals vs Ravens December 2025 Rematch
The two AFC North rivals met again on December 14, 2025, and the second game looked completely different.
Baltimore defeated Cincinnati 24–0.
Lamar Jackson completed 8 of 12 passes for 150 yards and two touchdowns, while Derrick Henry rushed for 100 yards on 11 carries.
For Cincinnati, Burrow passed for 225 yards but threw two interceptions. Ja’Marr Chase recorded 132 receiving yards.
The contrasting results demonstrate how quickly an NFL divisional matchup can change.
The November game was dominated by Cincinnati’s turnover advantage and Burrow’s return. The December rematch was controlled by Baltimore’s defense and running game.
Bengals vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats Comparison
Looking at the major offensive statistics from the November matchup provides a useful comparison.
| Player | Team | Passing Yards | Rushing Yards | Receiving Yards | TD |
| Joe Burrow | Bengals | 261 | 8 | — | 2 pass |
| Lamar Jackson | Ravens | 246 | — | — | 0 pass |
| Chase Brown | Bengals | — | 78 | — | 0 |
| Derrick Henry | Ravens | — | 60 | — | 1 rush |
| Ja’Marr Chase | Bengals | — | — | 110 | 0 |
| Isaiah Likely | Ravens | — | — | 95 | 0 |
The comparison makes the difference clear.
Burrow and Jackson were relatively close in passing yardage, but Cincinnati had the better overall offensive balance and dramatically better turnover margin.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the Bengals vs Ravens final score?
The Cincinnati Bengals defeated the Baltimore Ravens 32–14 in the November 27, 2025 matchup.
How many yards did Joe Burrow throw for?
Joe Burrow threw for 261 yards and two touchdowns.
How many yards did Lamar Jackson throw for?
Lamar Jackson recorded 246 passing yards.
Who was the Bengals’ leading receiver?
Ja’Marr Chase led Cincinnati with 110 receiving yards on seven receptions.
Who led the Ravens in receiving?
Isaiah Likely led Baltimore with 95 receiving yards on five receptions.
How many rushing yards did Derrick Henry have?
Derrick Henry recorded 60 rushing yards on 10 carries and scored one touchdown.
How many rushing yards did Chase Brown have?
Chase Brown rushed for 78 yards on 15 carries.
Which team had more turnovers?
Baltimore committed five turnovers, while Cincinnati had one.
Who led Cincinnati in tackles?
Jordan Battle led the Bengals with 10 tackles.
Who led Baltimore in tackles?
Roquan Smith led the Ravens with 11 tackles.
Why did Cincinnati win?
The Bengals won because they protected the football, forced five Ravens turnovers, controlled possession and received a strong performance from Joe Burrow in his return.
Final Verdict
The Bengals vs Baltimore Ravens match player stats from November 27, 2025 tell the story of a game Cincinnati won through a combination of offensive balance, defensive pressure and exceptional turnover production.
Joe Burrow’s return was the headline event. His 261 passing yards and two touchdowns gave the Bengals the quarterback production they needed.
Ja’Marr Chase was equally important, producing 110 receiving yards and keeping Baltimore’s secondary under constant pressure.
On the ground, Chase Brown added 78 yards, while Cincinnati’s defense repeatedly forced Baltimore into mistakes.
For the Ravens, Lamar Jackson produced 246 passing yards and Derrick Henry contributed 60 rushing yards and a touchdown. Isaiah Likely also posted 95 receiving yards. However, those individual performances could not overcome five turnovers and a major disadvantage in time of possession.
The final 32–14 Cincinnati victory therefore stands as an important example of how NFL games are often decided by efficiency rather than raw yardage alone.
For readers researching bengals vs baltimore ravens match player stats, the most important numbers are clear: Burrow’s 261 passing yards, Chase’s 110 receiving yards, Brown’s 78 rushing yards, Jackson’s 246 passing yards, Henry’s 60 rushing yards, and Baltimore’s five turnovers.
Those statistics explain why Cincinnati was able to turn a competitive AFC North matchup into a convincing road victory.
1 Comment
Pingback: Detroit Tigers vs Seattle Mariners Match Player Stats: Complete 2026 Series Breakdown - matchmagtoday.com